The Allstate Sugar Bowl has the first at-large pick among the BCS games this season. If the Sugar Bowl loses the SEC champion to the BCS title game, it will make two picks right off the top.
What are the chances one of those picks comes from the Big Ten?
"If we lose Auburn, I'd say it'd be pretty good," Sugar Bowl CEO Paul Hoolahan told me this week.
If Auburn beats South Carolina in Saturday's SEC championship and advances to the BCS national title game, the Sugar Bowl would look first to the SEC for a replacement. Arkansas is widely projected to be the next choice, although LSU also is under consideration.
At that point, Hoolahan and the rest of the Sugar Bowl selection committee likely would look to the North.
"I've got to believe with the likes of Wisconsin, Ohio State and Michigan State, and all of them ranked in the top 10, any one of those teams would be very desirable," Hoolahan said.
As the highest-ranked Big Ten team in the BCS standings, Wisconsin is expected to receive the league's automatic BCS berth and head to the Rose Bowl.
"The conventional wisdom suggests that both Ohio State and Michigan State are viable options for us and very attractive options," Hoolahan said.
Michigan State has launched a major awareness campaign this week to put itself on the radar for BCS bowls. Coach Mark Dantonio has conducted interviews with several national and regional media outlets as the Spartans try to outline why they should be in the discussion for the big bowls.
Hoolahan has spoken with Dantonio and athletic director Mark Hollis, and while he doesn't characterize Michigan State's P.R. push as unusual, the message is coming through.
"People that know they're being looked at in the at-large pool, they certainly want to put their best foot forward and present themselves in the most favorable light," Hoolahan said. "That’s happened quite obviously with Michigan State, also with Ohio State and Wisconsin and everybody else in the last week or two. ... I don't find it a hard press. [Michigan State is] excited, and they want us to feel their excitement, and we certainly do."
Michigan State and Ohio State didn't meet on the field this year, but they're certainly in competition for an at-large bowl spot. Hoolahan has had several conversations with Ohio State AD Gene Smith and coach Jim Tressel.
The Michigan State-Ohio State debate comes down to selecting a proven brand with a strong track record (Ohio State) or a new option boosted by its best season in recent memory (Michigan State).
"If you’re looking at the uncertainty factor, you know you have a group that hasn’t been," Hoolahan said. "Generally speaking, when a group that hasn't been to a BCS [bowl] gets a chance to go, they usually bring a healthy following with them. But that's not the end-all, be-all in the final analysis."
And the Sugar Bowl knows what to expect with the Buckeyes.
"We’ve known them and we have a little more background and experience," Hoolahan said. "They're less of an unknown."
One factor that could work against Michigan State for the Sugar Bowl is the potential opponent. While Arkansas is a good team, the Hogs don't move the needle as much nationally as Alabama or Florida most years or Auburn this year.
Pairing Arkansas against Michigan State could be a tough sell to casual fans, while Ohio State is a team that always attracts attention, especially as if it's trying to end its struggles against the SEC.
"Anything that adds flair, you certainly want to do that because it helps your broadcast partner," Hoolahan said. "They're always looking for good ratings. They're looking for games that can sell, as we do."
Source: http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/34467/big-ten-teams-on-sugar-bowls-radar
Patrick Edwards Eugene Sims Aldrick Robinson Tory Collins Brandon McRae Jermelle Cudjo
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿